Comments for Nedoweb http://www.nedoweb.com Your web and cloud solutions partner Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:49:19 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.6.11 Comment on The provided anti-forgery token was meant for user “”, but the current user is “myUsername”. by Robert http://www.nedoweb.com/2013/10/03/anti-forgery-token-meant-user/#comment-119 Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:49:19 +0000 http://www.nedoweb.com/?p=1556#comment-119 How did you end up fixing this? I have the same issue

]]>
Comment on The provided anti-forgery token was meant for user “”, but the current user is “myUsername”. by ad http://www.nedoweb.com/2013/10/03/anti-forgery-token-meant-user/#comment-6 Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:34:39 +0000 http://www.nedoweb.com/?p=1556#comment-6 This worked for me, Thanks!

]]>
Comment on The provided anti-forgery token was meant for user “”, but the current user is “myUsername”. by grof http://www.nedoweb.com/2013/10/03/anti-forgery-token-meant-user/#comment-5 Thu, 13 Feb 2014 07:10:03 +0000 http://www.nedoweb.com/?p=1556#comment-5 I think, there is a scenario where this solution isn’t working: if a user opens the same login page in a browser on two different tabs (for some unexplainable reason), do a login in tab 1, then do a login in tab 2, the error occurs, maybe because the GET login page is not access any more, only the POST login page, where [ValidateAntiForgeryToken] is added.I read a solution, which recommends to add AntiForgeryConfig.SuppressIdentityHeuristicChecks = true to Global.asax.cs, but it didn’t helped for me..

]]>
Comment on The provided anti-forgery token was meant for user “”, but the current user is “myUsername”. by Ouail http://www.nedoweb.com/2013/10/03/anti-forgery-token-meant-user/#comment-4 Tue, 04 Feb 2014 06:26:23 +0000 http://www.nedoweb.com/?p=1556#comment-4 Thank you buddy, it worked for me

]]>
Comment on The provided anti-forgery token was meant for user “”, but the current user is “myUsername”. by Steve http://www.nedoweb.com/2013/10/03/anti-forgery-token-meant-user/#comment-3 Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:26:16 +0000 http://www.nedoweb.com/?p=1556#comment-3 Works great for me, thanks!

]]>
Comment on The provided anti-forgery token was meant for user “”, but the current user is “myUsername”. by sofwreng http://www.nedoweb.com/2013/10/03/anti-forgery-token-meant-user/#comment-2 Mon, 06 Jan 2014 17:20:03 +0000 http://www.nedoweb.com/?p=1556#comment-2 Did absolutely nothing to fix the issue.

]]>
Comment on What Do You Mean “Web Enable My Business”? by Jones http://www.nedoweb.com/2010/06/18/web-enable-your-business/#comment-9 Tue, 08 Mar 2011 15:15:05 +0000 http://www.nedoweb.com/?p=1569#comment-9 A nice article with a great stuff of information, I really like that. This is really interesting site that gives huge of information to all readers thanks a lot.

]]>
Comment on Loose your customers by Tapera Mashandudze http://www.nedoweb.com/2009/10/09/loose-your-customers/#comment-11 Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:47:39 +0000 http://www.nedoweb.com/?p=1581#comment-11 Loosing customers is not a right thing. I think the best way to deal with customers is to make them feel important in whatever business. When the customer is wrong, it is better to pretend as if you are one who made the mistake. Paining one customer leads to the spread of bad reputation. stick to your customers!

]]>
Comment on Loose your customers by Gabby http://www.nedoweb.com/2009/10/09/loose-your-customers/#comment-10 Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:49:53 +0000 http://www.nedoweb.com/?p=1581#comment-10 Ouch, I feel this customers pain. We did the same thing by turning down what our suppliers were telling us even though we knew they were right. In the end we went back to them and admitted our ignorance and asked them to proceed with their plans (with subtle differences). The benefits have been eye opening! Nice touch. Gabby

]]>